The Problem

Engineering drawing review at industrial scale is broken.

Capital projects generate hundreds to thousands of engineering drawings, each one needing review against codes, project specifications, and cross-discipline interfaces. The process is manual, slow, and increasingly fragile.

01 / Speed

Manual review is too slow

A single drawing set can absorb experienced engineers for days per discipline. Project schedules slip while reviews queue up.

02 / Cost

Errors caught late are costly

A missed clash, an incorrect BOM, an undersized line, caught in the field instead of on paper, multiplies cost by orders of magnitude. Industry studies put rework at 4 to 6% of total project cost.

03 / Talent

Discipline depth is shrinking

Senior reviewers are scarce, expensive, and increasingly retiring. Project complexity is rising at exactly the moment depth is leaving the room.

The Platform

An AI reviewer that reasons over your drawings.

EngMind doesn’t run a fixed checklist. It reads each drawing, decides which technical reviews are relevant for what’s actually on the page, and executes them in parallel — with humans in the loop on every finding.

Upload

Drop in a PDF drawing. EngMind auto-detects discipline, drawing type, title block, and revision metadata.

Reason

An AI reasoning layer determines which technical reviews are required for the specific content, and dispatches them in parallel.

Find & Cite

Each finding cites the applicable standard, includes a cropped drawing reference, and is graded by severity and confidence.

Approve

Your engineers stay in the loop. Approve, dismiss, or escalate every finding. Export an audit-ready report.

See how the platform works →

Inside the Platform

Findings you can act on. Evidence you can audit.

Every finding ships with a problem statement, the standard reference, the affected components, and a cropped drawing zone showing exactly where the issue lives. Reviewers stamp Approved, Hold, or Reject, and the system tracks the audit trail.

app.engmind.ai — results · ISO-131-25003-01

View dashboard mockup → View canvas review →

Engineering Modules

12 Engineering Modules. 6 Cross-Functional Modules. One Platform.

Every review your project needs, anchored in Design Codes and Project Specifications. Process, mechanical, civil, structural, electrical, instrumentation, and specialty disciplines, plus cross-functional intelligence layers, all standards-aware and evidence-backed.

Drawing Intake & Reconciliation

Read the drawing. Extract what matters.

▤

Drawing Classification & Intake

Auto-detects discipline, drawing type, title block, revision, and project metadata from the PDF itself.

▤

BOM Extraction & Reconciliation

Bill of Materials extracted from the drawing and cross-checked against symbols, line lists, and project specifications.

▤

Dimension Verification

Geometric and dimensional consistency checks across views, callouts, and reference drawings.

Compliance & Standards

Verify against the codes that govern your project.

✓

Code & Spec Compliance Review

Verifies drawing design against client-provided project codes, technical specifications, and engineering standards before fabrication begins.

✓

Material Compliance Check

Validates material selections, corrosion class, and coating systems against project metallurgy specs and operating environment.

✓

Standards-Aware Findings

Every finding cites ASME, API, ISA, IEEE, IEC, NFPA, or applicable national codes, with confidence scoring.

See all 18 modules and capabilities →

Built For

Owners. Engineers. Contractors. Consultants.

Every drawing review on a capital project flows through one of four roles. EngMind multiplies senior-engineer review capacity for all of them, anchored to the same Design Codes and Project Specifications.

PROJECT OWNERS

Owners & Operators

Independent verification of every deliverable from EPCs and engineering vendors. Traceable evidence on every finding. Designs are signed off compliant, with the audit trail to prove it — before construction starts.

Energy majors & NOCs
Petrochemical & chemical operators
Mining & metals owners
Power generators & utilities
Pharma & life sciences

ENGINEERING

Engineering Companies

Multiply senior-reviewer capacity across peak workloads. Standardize quality across projects and disciplines. Train junior engineers with explainable, codes-anchored reasoning instead of tribal knowledge.

Global engineering firms
Regional design houses
Owner's engineers
Specialist engineering practices
Multidiscipline consultancies

CONTRACTORS

EPC & EPCM Firms

Absorb peak review load without hiring against the cycle. Run cross-discipline checks at scale. Hold quality on aggressive schedules where review velocity directly drives project margin.

Global EPC contractors
Regional EPCs
EPCM contractors
Module fabricators
Specialty subcontractors

CONSULTANTS

Independent Consultants

Punch above your weight class. Offer faster turnaround and broader discipline coverage than your team size suggests. Senior-grade review delivered at the speed of one engineer plus EngMind.

Technical due diligence firms
Independent verifiers (IV)
Subject-matter experts
Expert-witness practices
Boutique engineering consultancies

⛽

Oil & Gas

UPSTREAM · MIDSTREAM · DOWNSTREAM

⚗

Petrochemical

OLEFINS · AROMATICS · POLYMERS

⚒

Mining & Metals

EXTRACTION · PROCESSING

⚡

Power

CCGT · NUCLEAR · RENEWABLES

⚔

Pharma & Industrial

GMP FACILITIES

🔒

Security & Trust

Your drawings stay yours.

Engineering drawings are intellectual property of the highest sensitivity. EngMind is designed with secure, tenant-scoped access, governed storage policies, audit trails, controlled AI processing, and enterprise integration readiness — from the day-one default, not as a paid add-on.

Read the full security overview →

✓
Secure multi-tenant architecture Tenant-scoped access control · project-based storage policy · founder-approved tenant access during Beta.
✓
Enterprise integrations planned V1 Beta supports EngMind-managed GCP, Google Drive, and Microsoft SharePoint/OneDrive. Azure Blob, GCS, AWS S3, Box, and Dropbox under roadmap consideration.
✓
Confidential by design No customer drawing or finding is used to train any model. Ever.
✓
Audit, deletion & cost tracking Audit events captured · download and deletion controls · usage and cost tracking for every analysis.
✓
Compliance roadmap SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, and LGPD are part of the security roadmap and will be communicated according to verified implementation status.

Why EngMind

Why a generic AI tool can’t do this.

Reading PDFs is easy. Reasoning over engineering drawings the way a senior reviewer does, with discipline depth, standards literacy, and accountability, is not.

Domain reasoning, not pattern matching

Generic AI tools “read” a PDF. EngMind reasons over engineering drawings the way a senior reviewer does, deciding which checks are relevant for what’s actually on the page.

Discipline-deep knowledge corpus

Standards, codes, and best practices baked in across every supported discipline. Continuously curated by working engineers, not crawled from the internet.

Customer-defined data sovereignty

Choose your data residency, IP protection, and compliance regime. Built for the procurement bar Tier 1 buyers and EPC clients demand, in any jurisdiction.

Aligned to project economics

Pricing scoped per project, modules, and analysis volume — matching how megaprojects actually scope, fund, and execute. No annual seat commits before value is proven.

Commercial Model

Priced around your modules and capabilities.

EngMind is delivered through a tailored commercial model built around the engineering modules and capabilities each project actually needs. Pricing is scoped per project envelope, per module mix, and per analysis volume — so it reflects real engineering economics, not a fixed seat list. We meet customers where their procurement and project budgets already are.

Request a Quote

Tell us which modules and capabilities are in scope. We respond within two business days.

Engineering drawing review,
Automated.